The Fintech Log

EPC Revises Payee Verification Rules as EU Instant Payments Challenge Legacy Clearing Systems

Oct. 21, 2026  •  Deep Dive  •  Banking & Payments

Summary

The European Payments Council has issued Version 1.1 of its Verification of Payee rulebook, effective September 20, 2026. The update addresses operational issues identified after launch, clarifies API specifications and refines the API Security Framework. It follows Eurozone deadlines requiring payment service providers to receive instant euro transfers from January 2025 and to send them and offer payee verification from October 2025.

Under Regulation (EU) 2024/886, instant euro credit transfers must complete within 10 seconds and be available around the clock. Payee verification occurs before a transfer is executed, adding a separate real-time exchange to the payment process. Together, the requirements challenge legacy systems built around scheduled batch processing. Non-eurozone EU providers face receiving and sending deadlines in 2027, while national supervisors are collecting transaction, fee and decline metrics to monitor compliance.

Full Article

The European Payments Council (EPC) has issued Version 1.1 of its Verification of Payee rulebook, with an effective date of September 20, 2026. The update addresses operational issues identified after launch, clarifies API specifications and refines the API Security Framework. It comes as payment service providers (PSPs) adapt their systems to EU requirements for instant euro transfers and checks on the intended recipient.

Regulation (EU) 2024/886 requires instant credit transfers in euro to complete within 10 seconds, end to end, and to be available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Verification of Payee adds a check before the transfer is executed. For PSPs using older clearing infrastructure, the challenge is not simply to move a payment faster: their systems must also exchange and act on information in real time rather than wait for scheduled processing windows.

Deadlines move the requirements into everyday operations

Eurozone PSPs were required to support receiving SEPA instant credit transfers by January 9, 2025. A second deadline, October 9, 2025, required them to support sending instant transfers and offer Verification of Payee. For non-eurozone EU providers, receiving capability is required by January 9, 2027, followed by sending and payee-verification integration by July 9, 2027.

The regulation also requires price parity: PSPs cannot charge more for an instant euro credit transfer than for a standard, non-instant euro credit transfer. National financial supervisors have introduced ongoing compliance reporting, including periodic metrics on instant transactions, fees and declines. The reporting places operational performance alongside the legal requirement to offer the service.

The EPC’s revised verification rulebook is therefore relevant beyond the initial Eurozone deadlines. Its changes concern how providers implement the verification process, including API specifications and security rules, while another group of PSPs prepares for statutory go-lives in 2027.

Why batch clearing cannot simply be accelerated

Legacy batch-clearing systems typically collect payments for scheduled processing and end-of-day netting. Instant payments instead depend on a continuous, synchronous exchange of ISO 20022 messages. A PSP must be able to send or receive a request, process it and return a response without waiting for a batch window.

Clearing and settlement mechanisms such as TIPS and RT1 operate under EPC latency targets, with positive or negative response timeouts generally capped between five and nine seconds. Those shorter response windows leave limited room within the overall 10-second requirement for a provider’s own processing. A system that can eventually clear a payment but cannot respond promptly is not suited to this operating model.

Verification of Payee is a separate pre-execution step. The payer’s PSP queries the payee’s PSP in real time, using routing and verification mechanisms or the EPC Directory Service. The result tells the payer’s provider whether the supplied details are a match, a close match or no match before funds move. This means the verification exchange must be reliable in its own right; it cannot be treated as a check to complete after execution. The EPC’s API clarifications and security changes address the rules governing that exchange, rather than extending the deadline for a completed instant transfer.

Compliance reaches beyond clearing connections

The regulation changes another part of the payment workflow to avoid delays. Under Article 5d, mandatory daily screening of customers against sanctions lists replaces transaction-by-transaction sanctions screening for these transfers. The change addresses the time that checking each payment individually could add to processing, while retaining a required screening step.

The Instant Payments Regulation also amends the Settlement Finality Directive and PSD2 to give payment institutions and electronic money institutions direct access to central clearing systems without compulsory commercial bank sponsorship. Access, however, is distinct from the ability to operate within the required response times or deliver payee verification.

The EPC’s 2025 rulebook removed the former default €100,000 scheme-level cap on SEPA instant credit transfers. That does not mean every PSP must allow transfers of any size: institutions and national jurisdictions can still impose security or liquidity limits. Providers therefore have to manage their own limits within the broader instant-payment framework.

For non-eurozone EU PSPs, the next milestones are the 2027 receiving, sending and verification deadlines. For providers already subject to the Eurozone requirements, the revised EPC rulebook and ongoing supervisory reporting keep attention on how consistently their systems perform—not only whether they can connect to an instant-payment rail.


By 'TFL Editorial Team'
Researched with AI tools. Edited and fact-checked by our editors.


You May Also Like

Revolut’s expansion into UK consumer lending is facing closer regulatory scrutiny. The Financial Times reported on October 27, 2026, that the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority had ordered a Section 166 skilled-person review of the bank’s product approval processes and internal risk governance. The review comes as Revolut offers unsecured personal loans and prepares to introduce a domestic credit card, with mortgages planned later. Revolut UK CEO Francesca Carlesi has said the bank intends to package and sell loans through securitisation rather than retain substantial long-term credit exposure. Revolut is targeting a loan-to-deposit ratio of roughly 6%, far below the roughly 100% typical of incumbent British high-street banks. The strategy could support lending growth while limiting loans held on its balance sheet, but it does not eliminate credit risk. S&P Global has cited the possibility of higher credit losses as Revolut expands lending across multiple jurisdictions.

Oct. 27, 2026 • 3 min read

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) and Ant International signed a memorandum of understanding on October 26, 2026, to explore cross-border payments and digital treasury services. Their initial focus is Japan, Singapore and wider Southeast Asia. Engineering teams will examine whether Ant International’s Whale RTP platform can be integrated with SMBC’s institutional transaction banking and digital asset platforms. The agreement is exploratory, not the launch of a live settlement service. SMBC’s multi-market transaction banking rails are expected to support operations involving Ant International’s Alipay+, Antom and WorldFirst businesses. Ant International says its Whale platform processed more than US$600 billion in global treasury flows in 2025, with over 95% of transactions settling on the same day. Those figures describe the existing platform, not activity under the SMBC agreement. The MoU follows separate tokenized-deposit work involving Ant International and other banks, including a live OCBC solution and an HSBC pilot.

Oct. 27, 2026 • 2 min read

Tech Mahindra and Finastra announced on October 23, 2026, that Tech Mahindra had completed its acquisition of Finastra’s cash management products and related intellectual property. The deal moves Tech Mahindra beyond implementing banking software for clients and into owning transaction banking products. Financial terms were not disclosed. The acquired portfolio includes Fusion Cash Management, Fusion Virtual Accounts and Fusion Liquidity Management, along with CashPlus, Global CashPlus and associated transaction banking APIs. Finastra product engineering and customer success personnel are being moved into Tech Mahindra’s banking, financial services and insurance division. Tech Mahindra plans to integrate the products into its existing Finastra Centre of Excellence to maintain service continuity for banking clients. The acquisition follows Tech Mahindra’s earlier purchase of an 85% stake in Canadian fintech Avant Techno Solutions and comes as Finastra divests businesses to concentrate on lending and payments software.

Oct. 27, 2026 • 3 min read

The European Payments Council implemented Version 1.1 of its Verification of Payee scheme rulebook on September 20, 2026, clarifying operations, API specifications and security after feedback from live deployment. Its directory service, operated with SWIFT, has also completed a live transition supporting provider reachability and routing. The changes come as non-eurozone EU payment providers work toward a July 9, 2027, compliance deadline. Required under the EU Instant Payments Regulation for both instant and standard SEPA credit transfers, Verification of Payee checks recipient details before authorization and must be offered free to users. The inter-provider exchange has a five-second operational maximum and can return a match, close match, no match or verification-not-possible result. A close match supplies the verified recipient name for the payer to review. A warning does not necessarily prevent a transfer: liability depends on whether a payer proceeds despite it or a provider fails to perform a required check.

Oct. 26, 2026 • 3 min read

Fireblocks has rejected an Axios report that Visa was in advanced talks to acquire the digital-asset infrastructure company for about $2.5 billion. Fireblocks said the reported discussions were not taking place at present. Visa declined to comment on the claim, while Coinbase separately denied reports that it was considering a bid. None of the companies has confirmed an acquisition process. The reported price would be about 69% below Fireblocks’ $8 billion valuation from its January 2022 Series E funding round. The company generated $124 million in revenue in 2024 but remained unprofitable, and it has initiated plans to cut 60 to 70 jobs amid the rumors. Visa already uses Fireblocks as an institutional client and works with it on an interoperability initiative. Those existing links provide context for the speculation, but do not establish that a transaction is under discussion.

Oct. 26, 2026 • 3 min read

TerraPay and J.P. Morgan have connected TerraPay Verify with Kinexys Liink so participating financial institutions can check recipient details before sending cross-border payments to mobile money wallets or bank accounts. Announced on October 22, 2026, the integration allows Liink participants to configure bi-directional API queries with TerraPay Verify. It extends a validation network that already covers account details in more than 70 countries to wallet-related checks. The partnership targets a source of payment failures: a 2026 LexisNexis Risk Solutions study cited during the rollout attributed 10% to 15% of cross-border payment failures to incorrect recipient or beneficiary details. Wallet identifiers can differ from conventional bank-account formats, making early checks useful but not a guarantee that a payment will complete. The companies have not publicly disclosed commercial terms, query pricing or country-by-country rollout plans, and the available information does not establish how much the integration will reduce failures in practice.

Oct. 25, 2026 • 3 min read